Search Results for "superior right"

12 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 12 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Deemed Conveyance under MOFA Cannot Be Set Aside Merely on Technical Objections When Developer Fails to Execute Conveyance – Bombay High Court

The dispute arose when a cooperative housing society sought deemed conveyance of the land and building from the developer who had failed to execute th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision Application in Rent Dispute - Eviction Upheld Under Bombay Rent Act for Non-Payment of Arrears Before First Hearing Date

The High Court dismissed a revision application filed by the tenant challenging eviction orders passed under the Bombay Rent Act -- The landlord had p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Eviction Decree in Property Rent Dispute. Petitioner's appeal dismissed, reaffirming the plaintiff's right to recover possession and arrears of rent.

A dispute over property rent payments and ownership, where the petitioner challenges a decree from the District Judge, Nashik. The decrees relate to R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Partition Suit Based on Daughter's Inheritance Rights Under Pre-1956 Hindu Law. Property Deemed Self-Acquired, Daughter Inherits by Succession, Not Survivorship, Under Mitakshara Principles, Leading to Partition Decree for Appellants.

The dispute arose from a partition suit filed by Thangammal, claiming a 1/5th share in properties originally owned by Marappa Gounder. The suit was di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Pre-emption Case, Holding Limitation Runs from Each Sale Under Rajasthan Pre-Emption Act, 1966. Each Sale of Property Gives Fresh Cause of Action for Pre-emption, and Failure to Challenge Earlier Sales Does Not Bar the Right Under Article 97 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The appeal arose from a suit for pre-emption filed by the predecessor-in-interest of respondent No.1 (original plaintiff) against the appellant and ot...