Search Results for "void agreement"

6 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Restoration of Appeal Allowed: Compromise Non-compliance Entitles Statutory Remedy. Failure to honor compromise terms allows restoration of appeal under the Code of Civil Procedure.

The Supreme Court held that in cases of non-compliance with compromise terms, a party has the statutory right to seek restoration of an appeal. The Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Overturns High Court Decision, Validates 1985 Sale Deed in Landmark Land Ownership Case. Appellants win long-fought legal battle over fraudulent land transactions; Supreme Court awards exemplary costs for injustice.

The case concerns issues of land ownership, fraud, and legal manipulation, with the appellants suffering due to the malicious intent of the respondent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Land Dispute Resolved: Court Upholds Cooperative Societies' Ownership Rights. Court Affirms Validity of 1960 Conveyance, Rejects Claims by Municipal Authorities

The dispute Regarding a 1960 conveyance deed concerning common plots in the Juhu Vile Parle Development (JVPD) scheme between the Bombay Housing Boar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Telecom Company's Claim for Refund of Entry Fee After 2G Licences Quashed Due to Illegal Government Policy. Restitution Under Section 65 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Denied as Quashing Did Not Render Contracts Void, and Set-Off Policy Upheld Under Article 14 of Constitution.

The dispute involved a telecom company seeking a refund of an Entry Fee of Rs 1454.94 crores paid for 2G licences across twenty-one service areas, aft...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute Over 'Change in Law' Clause — High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act. Interpretation of contractual clause by Arbitral Tribunal was plausible and not perverse, hence not liable to be set aside under Section 34.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by South East Asia Marine Engineering and Constructions Ltd. (SEAMEC Ltd.) against the judgment of the Gauh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Limitation for Voidable Alienations by Guardian. Suit for Declaration and Possession Without Seeking Setting Aside of Sale Deeds Held Maintainable Under Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a property dispute arising from a Will executed by Petha Gounder on 17.05.1971, bequeathing a life interest to his sons Kannan and B...