Case Note & Summary
The petition challenges an arbitral award dated November 23, 2023, under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The award directed the petitioner to pay the respondents Rs. 65,72,558/- after adjusting for their claim of Rs. 59,97,210/-. The petitioner contends the award is based on an unproven valuation report and alleges procedural lapses. The court considers whether to admit the petition and grant an unconditional stay.
Introduction and Petition Details
Filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Challenges part of the arbitral award dated November 23, 2023.Facts Narrated by the Petitioner
Loan Agreement details and terms. Execution of Demand Promissory Note and Deeds of Guarantee. Hypothecation of assets. Occurrence of default and invocation of arbitration.Arbitration Proceedings Timeline
Statements of Claim and Counter Claims. Various arbitration meetings and communications. Sale of assets and valuation disputes. Substitution of parties.Petitioners' Grounds for Challenge
Counter claim barred by limitation. Arbitrator's reliance on unproven valuation report. Procedural lapses and lack of proper opportunity to respond. Violation of principles of natural justice.Respondents' Submissions
Support for the arbitral award. Reference to legal precedents and procedures.Court's Preliminary Observations
Findings of the arbitrator regarding sale of assets and valuation. Reliance on an unproven valuation report amounts to patent illegality. Petitioners' failure to file a reply to the counter claim not an admission of allegations.Legal Context and Judgements Cited
Reference to Section 36 of the Arbitration Act. Judgements cited by respondents. Analysis of procedural requirements and legal precedents.Conclusion and Court's Decision on Admission and Stay
Need for oral evidence to prove the valuation report. Admittance of the petition on grounds of patent illegality. Consideration of unconditional stay based on legal provisions.
Issue of Consideration: CFM Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. Ors. Versus M/s. SAR Parivahan Pvt. Ltd. Ors
Premium Content
The Issue of Consideration is only available to subscribed members.
Subscribe Now to access critical case issues


