Supreme Court Allows Pension Arrears to Retired Bank Employee Despite Employer's Delay in Remitting Contribution. Employer's Obligation to Forward Pension Papers Cannot Be Withheld Due to Disciplinary Proceedings; Para 5(2) of Pension Scheme Held Ultra Vires to Deny Arrears.

  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Issac T M, was an employee of the Idukki District Co-operative Bank Ltd from 1978 until his superannuation on 31 January 2007. The Government of Kerala had formulated a self-financing pension scheme called the State Co-operative Bank and District Co-operative Bank Employees Self Financing Pension Scheme 2005. The appellant was eligible for pension under para 5(1)(i) of the Scheme. However, a week before his retirement, disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him, resulting in a liability of Rs 6.76 lakhs. Consequently, the Bank withheld his retiral dues and did not forward his pension papers to the Kerala State Co-operative Employees Pension Board. The appellant expressed willingness to join the Pension Scheme but objected to the interest demanded on the employer's contribution. After his exoneration by a Sub Committee on 28 September 2013, the Bank finally recommended pension and the appellant deposited the required amount on 12 October 2013. Pension was eventually paid from 1 November 2013. The appellant filed a writ petition seeking pension from 1 February 2007 with interest. The Single Judge dismissed the petition, holding that para 5(2) of the Pension Scheme stipulates pension only from the month succeeding remittance of employer's contribution. The Division Bench affirmed this view. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's judgment. The Court noted that para 19 of the Scheme entitles the appellant to pension from 1 February 2007. It relied on the decision in T K Jayan vs State of Kerala & Ors, which struck down para 5(2) to the extent it denies arrears of pension due to employer's delay. The Court directed the Pension Board to pay arrears from 1 February 2007 to 1 November 2013 within four weeks, and if any interest is payable due to delayed receipt of contribution, the Bank must remit it within one week of intimation. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Pension - Entitlement from date of retirement - Para 19 of the State Co-operative Bank and District Co-operative Bank Employees Self Financing Pension Scheme 2005 - The appellant, an employee who retired on 31 January 2007, was eligible for pension under para 5(1)(i) and para 19 provides that superannuation pension shall commence from the month succeeding retirement. The Court held that the appellant is entitled to pension from 1 February 2007, and the employer's delay in remitting contribution cannot deprive him of arrears. (Paras 5-6)

B) Service Law - Pension Scheme - Para 5(2) - Ultra vires - The provision that pension is payable only from the month succeeding remittance of employer's contribution was struck down by the Kerala High Court in T K Jayan vs State of Kerala & Ors. The Supreme Court applied the same reasoning, holding that any delay by the Bank cannot result in detrimental consequences for retirees. (Para 6)

C) Service Law - Pension - Employer's obligation - Interest on delayed payment - The Bank delayed forwarding pension papers due to disciplinary proceedings, but the appellant was exonerated. The Court directed the Pension Board to pay arrears of pension from 1 February 2007 to 1 November 2013 within four weeks, and if any interest is payable due to delayed receipt of contribution, the Bank must remit it within one week of intimation. (Paras 7-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant is entitled to pension from the date of retirement (1 February 2007) despite the employer's delay in remitting the employer's contribution to the pension fund, and whether para 5(2) of the Pension Scheme can be applied to deny arrears of pension.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Impugned judgment of High Court set aside. Second respondent (Pension Board) directed to pay arrears of pension from 1 February 2007 to 1 November 2013 within four weeks. If any interest is payable due to delayed receipt of contribution, first respondent (Bank) to remit within one week of intimation. Arrears to be paid within two months of receipt of certified copy. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Pension entitlement
  • Delay in remittance
  • Employer's obligation
  • Interest on delayed payment
  • Ultra vires of para 5(2) of Pension Scheme
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 lawtext (SC) (7) 139

Civil Appeal No. 5430 of 2019 (@ SLP(C) No. 30948/2018)

2019-07-12

Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Indira Banerjee

Mr. Abir Phukan (for appellant), Mr P V Surendranath (for first respondent), Mr P V Dinesh (for second respondent)

Issac T M

The Idukki District Co-operative Bank Ltd & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal against judgment of Division Bench of Kerala High Court dismissing writ petition seeking pension arrears from date of retirement.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought sanction of pensionary dues from 1 February 2007 with interest and arrears.

Filing Reason

Bank delayed forwarding pension papers due to disciplinary proceedings, and pension was paid only from 1 November 2013 instead of from retirement.

Previous Decisions

Single Judge of Kerala High Court dismissed writ petition; Division Bench affirmed. Supreme Court granted leave.

Issues

Whether the appellant is entitled to pension from the date of retirement despite the employer's delay in remitting contribution? Whether para 5(2) of the Pension Scheme can be applied to deny arrears of pension?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that he is entitled to pension from 1 February 2007 under para 19 of the Scheme, and the Bank's delay cannot deprive him of arrears. Respondent Bank argued that para 5(2) stipulates pension only from month succeeding remittance, and disciplinary proceedings justified the delay.

Ratio Decidendi

An employee's entitlement to pension under the Scheme arises from the date of retirement as per para 19, and the employer's delay in remitting contribution cannot be used to deny arrears of pension. Para 5(2) of the Pension Scheme, to the extent it postpones pension until remittance, is ultra vires and cannot operate to the detriment of the retiree.

Judgment Excerpts

Para 19 of the Pension Scheme stipulates that superannuation pension shall commence from the beginning of the month succeeding the month in which the employee retires from service after attaining the age of superannuation. Any delay on the part of a Bank cannot result in detrimental consequences for the retirees. We find no reason or justification for the Bank to hold up the disbursal of the pensionary dues at the material time by not forwarding all the connected papers and information to the second respondent.

Procedural History

Appellant filed writ petition before Kerala High Court seeking pension from 1 February 2007. Single Judge dismissed on 6 August 2018. Division Bench affirmed. Appellant filed SLP before Supreme Court, which granted leave and heard the appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • State Co-operative Bank and District Co-operative Bank Employees Self Financing Pension Scheme 2005: Para 5, Para 19, Para 29
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Regulatory Commission's Order Restricting Depreciation to Actual Supply Period in Electricity Tariff Dispute. Depreciation under Regulation 6.32 of DERC (Terms and Conditions for Determination of Generation Tariff) Regulations, ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Pension Arrears to Retired Bank Employee Despite Employer's Delay in Remitting Contribution. Employer's Obligation to Forward Pension Papers Cannot Be Withheld Due to Disciplinary Proceedings; Para 5(2) of Pension Scheme Held Ult...