Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Reduction of Conviction from Murder to Culpable Homicide in Single Gunshot Case. Single gunshot fired during heated altercation on instigation does not constitute murder under Section 302 IPC but falls under Section 304 Part-I IPC.

  • 10
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against the High Court's judgment modifying the conviction of the respondent, Mohar Singh, from Section 302 IPC (murder) to Section 304 Part-I IPC (culpable homicide not amounting to murder). The incident occurred on 09.03.1993 when the respondent and co-accused Ajab Singh were hurling abuses at the deceased, Bhagwan Singh. When the deceased objected, Ajab Singh instigated the respondent to bring his gun. The respondent brought a gun from his house and fired a single shot, hitting the deceased's neck, causing death on the spot. The Trial Court convicted the respondent under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him to life imprisonment, while acquitting the co-accused. On appeal, the High Court noted that the respondent caused a single gunshot injury during a heated altercation and on instigation by an acquitted co-accused. It held that the act did not attract Section 302 IPC but fell under Section 304 Part-I IPC, and sentenced the respondent to the period already undergone (about seven years and six months) with a fine of Rs.15,000, which was paid. The Supreme Court, after hearing both sides, found no perversity in the High Court's judgment and dismissed the appeal, upholding the modification of conviction and sentence.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder vs. Culpable Homicide - Section 302 IPC, Section 304 Part-I IPC - Single Gunshot Injury - Heated Altercation - The respondent fired a single gunshot at the deceased during a heated altercation after being instigated by a co-accused who was acquitted. The High Court modified the conviction from Section 302 IPC to Section 304 Part-I IPC, holding that the act did not attract murder. The Supreme Court upheld this, finding no perversity in the High Court's judgment. (Paras 5-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Court was justified in modifying the conviction of the respondent from Section 302 IPC to Section 304 Part-I IPC based on the facts and circumstances of the case.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the High Court's judgment modifying the conviction from Section 302 IPC to Section 304 Part-I IPC and the sentence of period already undergone with fine of Rs.15,000.

Law Points

  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 304 Part-I IPC
  • Single gunshot injury
  • Heated altercation
  • Instigation
  • Reduction of sentence
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (SC) (8) 89

Criminal Appeal No(s). 976 of 2011

2019-08-07

R. Banumathi, A.S. Bopanna

Mr. R.K. Rathore (for appellant), Mr. Lakhan Singh Chauhan (for respondent)

State of Madhya Pradesh

Mohar Singh

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal by the State against reduction of conviction from murder to culpable homicide.

Remedy Sought

The State sought restoration of conviction under Section 302 IPC and life imprisonment.

Filing Reason

The State challenged the High Court's judgment modifying the conviction from Section 302 IPC to Section 304 Part-I IPC.

Previous Decisions

Trial Court convicted respondent under Section 302 IPC with life imprisonment; High Court modified to Section 304 Part-I IPC with sentence of period already undergone and fine.

Issues

Whether the High Court was justified in modifying the conviction from Section 302 IPC to Section 304 Part-I IPC.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant-State argued that the High Court erred in reducing the conviction. Respondent argued that the High Court correctly applied the law based on facts.

Ratio Decidendi

A single gunshot injury inflicted during a heated altercation on instigation does not constitute murder under Section 302 IPC but falls under Section 304 Part-I IPC, as the intention to cause death is not established.

Judgment Excerpts

the High Court has held that the respondent-accused has caused a single gun-shot injury to the deceased that too on being instigated by Ajab Singh who had already been acquitted by the Trial Court and, therefore, it cannot be held that the respondent had intentionally caused the gun-shot injury on the deceased-Bhagwan Singh. the impugned judgment of the High Court modifying the conviction of the respondent from Section 302 I.P.C. to Section 304 Part-I of I.P.C. cannot be said to be perverse and we do not find any good ground to interfere with the impugned judgment.

Procedural History

Trial Court convicted respondent under Section 302 IPC with life imprisonment on 21.03.1995. High Court modified conviction to Section 304 Part-I IPC on 09.04.2007. State appealed to Supreme Court, which dismissed the appeal on 07.08.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 302, 304 Part-I, 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Reduction of Conviction from Murder to Culpable Homicide in Single Gunshot Case. Single gunshot fired during heated altercation on instigation does not constitute murder under Section 302 IPC but falls u...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Repatriation of Minor Child to USA in Habeas Corpus Case, Modifies COVID-19 Conditions. The welfare of the child is paramount, and the foreign court's order is a factor; conditions requiring health certificates were impractical a...