Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Conversion Charges Dispute — Holds That Conversion Fees Payable as on Date of Sanad, Not Date of Application. The Court interpreted Section 32 of the Goa Land Revenue Code, 1968 to determine the relevant date for calculating conversion charges, ruling in favor of the State.

  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a dispute between the State of Goa and Dr. Alvaro Alberto Mousinho de Noronha Ferreira regarding the calculation of conversion charges for converting agricultural land to non-agricultural use. The respondent and his family members applied for conversion of 16014 sq. mtrs. of land on 08.03.2013. The application was acknowledged on 29.04.2013, and inspections and reports were carried out. On 22.05.2013, the Goa Land Revenue Code (Amendment) Act, 2013 came into force, substantially increasing conversion rates. On 19.07.2013, the respondent submitted an affidavit agreeing to pay conversion charges as demanded and undertaking not to sue for refund. On 19.09.2013, the State demanded payment at the enhanced rates, which the respondent paid under protest on 09.10.2013. The Sanad granting permission was issued on 19.11.2013. The respondent then filed a writ petition seeking refund of the excess amount, arguing that conversion charges should be based on rates as of the application date (08.03.2013). The High Court partly allowed the petition, quashing the demand and directing recalculation at pre-amendment rates for the 16014 sq. mtrs., but applying revised rates for additional land added after the amendment. The State appealed to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court framed the issue: whether conversion charges are payable as per rates on the date of application or on the date of the order allowing conversion. The Court analyzed Section 32 of the Goa, Daman & Diu Land Revenue Code, 1968, which prescribes a procedure for conversion. Sub-section (6) states that a Sanad shall be granted on payment of fees. The Court held that the relevant date for fixing conversion charges is the date of decision to grant the Sanad, not the date of application. The Court distinguished earlier judgments relied upon by the High Court (Union of India vs. Mahajan Industries Ltd., Union of India vs. Dev Raj Gupta, and Ansal & Saigal Properties (P) Ltd. vs. L. & D.O.) as either based on concessions or lacking a similar statutory provision. The Court also noted that Section 32(3) provides a timeline of 60 days for the Collector to decide, and if delayed, the applicant has a right to appeal. The respondent did not exercise this right despite the delay. The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's order, and dismissed the writ petition, holding that conversion charges are payable as per rates on the date of the Sanad (19.09.2013).

Headnote

A) Land Law - Conversion Charges - Date for Calculation - Section 32, Goa Land Revenue Code, 1968 - The question was whether conversion charges for change of land use should be calculated as per rates on the date of application or on the date of grant of Sanad. The Supreme Court held that under Section 32(6), the Sanad is granted on payment of fees, and the relevant date for fixing conversion charges is the date of decision to grant the Sanad, not the date of application. The Court distinguished earlier judgments as they were based on concessions or lacked a similar statutory provision. (Paras 2, 12-14)

B) Land Law - Statutory Timelines - Effect of Delay - Section 32(3), Goa Land Revenue Code, 1968 - Section 32(3) requires the Collector to decide within 60 days of receipt of application, failing which the applicant may appeal to the Secretary (Revenue) who must decide within 30 days. In this case, the application was made on 08.03.2013, the 60-day period expired on 07.05.2013, and the amendment increasing rates came on 22.05.2013. The applicant did not file an appeal despite the delay. The Court held that the applicant cannot take advantage of the department's delay when a statutory remedy was available. (Paras 12, 17)

C) Land Law - Affidavit and Undertaking - Estoppel - The respondent submitted an affidavit on 19.07.2013 agreeing to pay conversion charges as demanded and undertaking not to sue for refund. The Court noted this as a relevant factor, though the main decision rested on statutory interpretation. (Para 15)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether conversion charges payable for conversion of land from agricultural to non-agricultural should be calculated on the basis of the rates applicable at the time of making of the application or on the date when the order allowing conversion of land was issued?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's order, and dismissed the writ petition. The Court held that conversion charges are payable as per rates on the date of the Sanad (19.09.2013), not the date of application.

Law Points

  • Conversion charges payable on date of grant of Sanad
  • Section 32 of Goa Land Revenue Code
  • 1968
  • Timelines under Section 32
  • Right to appeal for delay
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (SC) (9) 70

Civil Appeal No. 7576 of 2019 (@Special Leave Petition (C) No. 24633 of 2017)

2019-08-20

Deepak Gupta, J.

State of Goa & Anr.

Dr. Alvaro Alberto Mousinho de Noronha Ferreira

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal against High Court order directing refund of excess conversion charges paid under protest.

Remedy Sought

The State of Goa sought to set aside the High Court's order and uphold the demand for conversion charges at enhanced rates.

Filing Reason

The respondent applied for conversion of agricultural land on 08.03.2013; rates were increased by amendment on 22.05.2013; the State demanded enhanced rates on 19.09.2013; respondent paid under protest and sought refund.

Previous Decisions

The High Court partly allowed the writ petition, quashing the demand for enhanced rates for the original 16014 sq. mtrs. and directing recalculation at pre-amendment rates, but applying revised rates for additional land added after amendment.

Issues

Whether conversion charges should be calculated as per rates on the date of application or on the date of grant of Sanad? Whether the High Court erred in relying on judgments that were based on concessions or lacked similar statutory provisions?

Submissions/Arguments

The respondent argued that conversion charges should be fixed as per rates on the date of application (08.03.2013) based on earlier Supreme Court and Delhi High Court judgments. The State argued that under Section 32(6) of the Code, the Sanad is granted on payment of fees, and the relevant date is the date of decision to grant the Sanad (19.09.2013).

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 32(6) of the Goa, Daman & Diu Land Revenue Code, 1968, the Sanad granting permission for conversion is issued on payment of fees, and the relevant date for fixing conversion charges is the date of decision to grant the Sanad, not the date of application. The statutory scheme provides timelines and a right to appeal, and the applicant cannot take advantage of departmental delay when a remedy was available.

Judgment Excerpts

The question of payment of conversion fees arises only when a decision is taken to grant a Sanad. Therefore, the relevant date for fixing the conversion charges will be the date on which the decision is taken to grant the Sanad. In the cases decided by this Court, there was no provision similar to Section 32 of the Code. Section 32 lays down certain timelines and gives a right to the land owners to file an appeal if the timeline is not adhered to by the department.

Procedural History

The respondent filed a writ petition in the High Court after paying conversion charges under protest. The High Court partly allowed the writ petition on 19.09.2013 (date of demand). The State appealed to the Supreme Court by way of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 24633 of 2017, which was converted into Civil Appeal No. 7576 of 2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Goa, Daman & Diu Land Revenue Code, 1968: 32
  • Goa Land Revenue Code (Amendment) Act, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Public Parking Lot and FSI Computation in Mumbai Building Project. The Court held that construction of public parking lot above plinth level without valid commencement certificate was illegal, and remanded...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Contractor's Appeal in ONGC Arbitration Dispute. Levy of Liquidated Damages Under Clause 2 of Contract Held Arbitrable, Not an Excepted Matter.