Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Students Against Bombay High Court Order Reconducting Admissions to JBIMS as Autonomous Institute. Court Holds That Autonomous Status of JBIMS Had Lapsed and Could Not Be Extended Retrospectively Without Following Due Process.

  • 10
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by 39 students from the University of Mumbai against the Bombay High Court's judgment dated 25.07.2019. The dispute concerned the admission process for the MBA/MMS courses at Jamnalal Bajaj Institute of Management Studies (JBIMS) for the academic year 2019-2020. JBIMS was established in 1965 as a department of the University of Mumbai and was granted autonomous status for five years from 2014-2015 to 2018-2019. The autonomous status expired on 11.07.2019. For the academic year 2019-2020, the Directorate of Technical Education treated JBIMS as a non-autonomous institute, resulting in 70% of seats being reserved for students from the University of Mumbai (home university) and 15% for other universities, with the remaining 15% as all-India quota. The Combined Entrance Test was conducted, and the first allotment list was published on 17.07.2019, granting admission to several students, including the appellants. On 18.07.2019, students from other universities filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the admissions, arguing that JBIMS should be treated as an autonomous institute, which would allow 85% of seats to be filled from all universities in the state based on merit. The High Court allowed the writ petition, directing that the admissions be reconducted treating JBIMS as autonomous. The Supreme Court noted that the High Court passed the order without impleading the students who had already been admitted and without issuing notice to the University Grants Commission. The Supreme Court held that the autonomous status of JBIMS had lapsed on 11.07.2019 and could not be deemed to continue merely because an application for extension was pending. The Directorate of Technical Education was justified in treating JBIMS as non-autonomous. The High Court's order was set aside, and the admissions already made were upheld. The Supreme Court also directed that the University of Mumbai should expedite the decision on JBIMS's application for extension of autonomous status.

Headnote

A) University Law - Autonomous Status - Extension of Autonomous Status - Section 122, Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016 - The autonomous status granted to JBIMS for five years from 2014-2015 to 2018-2019 expired on 11.07.2019. The application for extension was pending but not granted before the commencement of the admission process for 2019-2020. The High Court erred in holding that JBIMS continued to be autonomous merely because the application was pending. Autonomy does not continue automatically after expiry; it requires a fresh grant or extension by the University following due procedure. (Paras 2.1-2.10, 8-10)

B) Admission Law - Seat Allocation - Autonomous vs. Non-Autonomous Institutes - Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016 - For autonomous institutes, 85% seats are filled from all universities in the State; for non-autonomous university departments, 70% seats are reserved for the home university. Since JBIMS's autonomous status had lapsed, the Directorate of Technical Education correctly treated it as non-autonomous for the academic year 2019-2020. The High Court's direction to reconduct admissions treating JBIMS as autonomous was unsustainable. (Paras 2.9-2.10, 11-12)

C) Civil Procedure - Natural Justice - Impleadment of Affected Parties - The Bombay High Court passed the impugned order without impleading or hearing the students who had already been allotted seats in JBIMS based on the non-autonomous status. These students were vitally affected by the order. The High Court also failed to issue notice to the University Grants Commission, a necessary party. The impugned judgment is liable to be set aside for violation of principles of natural justice. (Paras 2.15, 3, 6.1-6.2, 13-14)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Jamnalal Bajaj Institute of Management Studies (JBIMS) retained its autonomous status after the expiry of the five-year period on 11.07.2019, and whether the Bombay High Court was justified in directing reconduct of admissions treating JBIMS as an autonomous institute without hearing the affected students and the University Grants Commission.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 25.07.2019, and upheld the admissions already made on the basis of JBIMS being a non-autonomous institute. The Court directed the University of Mumbai to expedite the decision on JBIMS's application for extension of autonomous status.

Law Points

  • Autonomous status of university department
  • Extension of autonomous status
  • Admission process for PG courses
  • Locus standi of affected students
  • Natural justice
  • Impleadment of necessary parties
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (SC) (9) 74

Civil Appeal No. 6753 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 19807/2019)

2019-09-02

Indu Malhotra

C.U. Singh, Sr. Adv. for Appellants; Prasenjit Keswani, Adv. for State of Maharashtra; S.B. Talekar, Adv. for Respondent Students; Sunil Fernandes, Adv. for University of Mumbai and JBIMS; Apoorv Kurup, Adv. for UGC; Maninder Singh, Sr. Adv. as amicus curiae

Rohan Virani & Ors.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal against Bombay High Court judgment directing reconduct of admissions to PG courses at JBIMS treating it as autonomous institute.

Remedy Sought

Appellants (students from University of Mumbai) sought to set aside the High Court order and uphold the admissions already made on the basis of JBIMS being non-autonomous.

Filing Reason

The Bombay High Court, without impleading the appellants or the UGC, directed reconduct of admissions treating JBIMS as autonomous, affecting the appellants' admissions.

Previous Decisions

Bombay High Court in Mayuri Umesh Munde v. DTE (2018) held 100% state quota illegal. The impugned judgment dated 25.07.2019 allowed the writ petition and directed reconduct of admissions.

Issues

Whether JBIMS retained its autonomous status after the expiry of the five-year period on 11.07.2019. Whether the Bombay High Court was justified in directing reconduct of admissions without impleading affected students and the UGC.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants: The impugned judgment was passed ex parte without impleading them despite their vitally affected interests. The UGC was not heard. The autonomous status had lapsed and could not be deemed to continue. Respondent Students (original writ petitioners): JBIMS continued to be autonomous as the application for extension was pending. The High Court correctly held that autonomy was not surrendered or revoked. State of Maharashtra: Did not dispute the power of the University to grant autonomy but supported the High Court's view. UGC: Not represented before the High Court; before the Supreme Court, submitted that concurrence of UGC was not mandatory for grant of autonomy by the University.

Ratio Decidendi

The autonomous status of a university department does not continue automatically after the expiry of the granted period merely because an application for extension is pending. The Directorate of Technical Education was justified in treating JBIMS as non-autonomous for the academic year 2019-2020. The High Court violated principles of natural justice by not impleading affected students and the UGC.

Judgment Excerpts

The autonomous status granted to JBIMS was for a period of five years from the academic year 2014-2015 to 2018-2019. The High Court recorded in para 42 of the impugned judgment that the Advocate General for Maharashtra did not dispute that the University of Mumbai had the power to confer autonomous status on JBIMS. The High Court further held that JBIMS continued to be an Autonomous Institute, since its Application for extension of autonomy was pending approval before the University.

Procedural History

JBIMS granted autonomous status from 2014-2015 to 2018-2019. For 2019-2020, DTE treated JBIMS as non-autonomous. CAP Round 1 allotment published on 17.07.2019. Writ Petition filed on 18.07.2019 by students from other universities. Bombay High Court allowed writ petition on 25.07.2019 directing reconduct of admissions. Appellants filed SLP on 14.08.2019, Supreme Court issued notice and ordered status quo. Final hearing on 28.08.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016: Section 122
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Students Against Bombay High Court Order Reconducting Admissions to JBIMS as Autonomous Institute. Court Holds That Autonomous Status of JBIMS Had Lapsed and Could Not Be Extended Retrospectively Without Following Due P...
Related Judgement
High Court Validity of Property Sale During Company Liquidation - Court Validates Transaction Under Companies Act