High Court Quashes FIR in SC/ST Act Case Due to Incident Not in Public View and Unexplained Delay. Alleged Caste-Based Abuse Occurred in Private Cow Shed with Only Family Members Present, Failing Requirements Under Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 15
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration: Whether the FIR registered under Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and Section 504 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 should be quashed as the alleged incident did not occur in a public place or within public view and there was unexplained delay and lack of independent witnesses.

Final Decision

In view of the above, Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms.

2026 LawText (BOM) (03) 33

Writ Petition No. 1356 of 2023

2026-03-12

A. S. Gadkari J. , Rajesh S. Patil J.

2026:BHC-AS:12132-DB

Mr. Rajiv Chavan, Senior Advocate a/w Ms. Rashmi Tiwari, Ms. Asmi Desai, Ms. Sonam Pandey i/b Ms. Bhairavi Waravdekar for the Petitioner, Mr. Vinod Chate, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State

Shailendra Bankebihari Singh

The State of Maharashtra, Laxman Raja Waghmare

Nature of Litigation: Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India read with Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR

Remedy Sought

Petitioner seeking relief of quashing and setting aside FIR bearing CR No.189 of 2022

Filing Reason

Alleged caste-based abuse incident in land dispute, with FIR registered under SC/ST Act and IPC

Previous Decisions

Order dated 14 February 2023 directed investigation to continue but chargesheet not to be filed without leave of Court; Order dated 1 December 2023 admitted Petition and confirmed interim relief

Issues

Whether the FIR should be quashed as the alleged incident did not occur in a public place or within public view under SC/ST Act Whether there was unexplained delay and lack of independent witnesses warranting quashing

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued incident in cow shade not public place, delay of 30 days unexplained, witnesses not independent, FIR malicious Respondent argued delay meager, prima facie case made out, incident at public place, Affidavit should be considered

Ratio Decidendi

For an offence under Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of SC/ST Act, caste-based abuse must occur in a public place or within public view and be witnessed by independent persons; incident in private cow shed with only family and friends present does not satisfy this requirement, and unexplained delay indicates malicious intent, justifying quashing under Article 226 and Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Judgment Excerpts

"the alleged incident of abusing the Respondent No.2 on his caste took place in the evening of 25 th November, 2022, in the cow shade of Respondent No.2" "the said incident did not take place either in the 'public view' or at a 'public place'" "abuses on the caste should be in the presence of independent witnesses"

Procedural History

Petition filed; Order dated 14 February 2023 granted ad-interim relief; Order dated 1 December 2023 admitted Petition and confirmed interim relief; judgment pronounced on 12 March 2026 quashing FIR

Related Judgement
High Court High Court Quashes FIR in SC/ST Act Case Due to Incident Not in Public View and Unexplained Delay. Alleged Caste-Based Abuse Occurred in Private Cow Shed with Only Family Members Present, Failing Requirements Under Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of Sch...
Related Judgement
High Court "High Court Decides Landmark Case on Access Rights and Regularization of University Compound Wall" "Balancing statutory authority and individual property rights under the Town and Country Planning Act."