Search Results for "Electricity Tariff"

14 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 14 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Indian Railways' Appeals, Upholds Its Status as Deemed Distribution Licensee Under Electricity Act, 2003. Railways Not Liable to Pay Cross-Subsidy Surcharge for Open Access as It Is Not a Consumer Under Section 2(15) of the Electricity Act, 2003.

The Supreme Court of India allowed the appeals filed by Indian Railways against the judgment of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) dated 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Demand Notices for Recovery of Rebate on Electricity Tariff. Promissory Estoppel Yields to Public Interest – Rebate Withdrawal Validated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, holding that: The appellants were not entitled to the rebate under the notification dated 30.09.1991, as the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Industrial Tariff for Manufacturing Activity in Electricity Tariff Dispute. Appellate Authority's Decision Affirmed; R&D Activity Categorized as Manufacturing, No Unauthorized Use of Electricity Found

The petition challenges an order from the Appellate Authority under the Electricity Act which determined the tariff category for the respondent’s ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Electricity Tariff Dispute — Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v. Renew Wind Energy (Rajkot) Pvt Ltd. Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) Scheme does not override State Commission's power to determine tariff for wind energy under Section 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

The case involves appeals under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003, by Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited and other distribution licensees against...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by DISCOMs and Generating Companies in Electricity Tariff Dispute — Change in Law Compensation for Coal Shortfall Must Be Computed Based on Actual GCV and SHR as per PPAs.

The judgment involves two civil appeals concerning the determination of compensatory tariff for Change in Law events under long-term Power Purchase Ag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by MSEDCL in Electricity Tariff Dispute Over Change in Law Due to Wildlife Notification. Held that the notification declaring buffer zone around Tadoba Tiger Reserve constituted a 'Change in Law' under PPAs, entitling APML to compensatory tariff for all four PPAs.

The present appeals arise from a dispute between Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), the appellant, and Adani Power M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Generating Company and State Utility in Electricity Tariff Dispute. Deemed Generation Incentive Not Payable After 1995 Notification; Supplementary Agreement Bars Retrospective Interest on Deemed Loan.

The Supreme Court dismissed two appeals arising from a common order of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) concerning a power purchase agre...