Search Results for "service"

Trending :

Supreme Court Sets Aside Appointment Orders in Steel Plant Recruitment Case Due ...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Para-Teachers Seeking Regularisation in Jhark...
Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Karnataka SC/ST Land Transfer Case Due to Lach...
Supreme Court Allows Collaborator's Arbitration Request Despite No Privity of Co...
Supreme Court Upholds Regulatory Commission's Order Restricting Depreciation to ...

Search Results for "service"

2252 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2252 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Booth Allottee for Persistent Default in Payment - Resumption Order Confirmed. Rank defaulter not entitled to relief despite multiple opportunities; Article 142 cannot protect unscrupulous buyer who paid only 25% of sale consideration and defaulted for 23 years.

21 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Rajiv Vohra against the State of Haryana and others, confirming the resumption order passed by the Est...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim for Excise Duty Paid Under Protest by Manufacturer — Limitation Period Under Section 11B Applies Separately to Buyer. The right of the buyer to claim refund under Section 11B(2)(e) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is distinct from that of the manufacturer, and the benefit of the second proviso (duty paid under protest) does not extend to the buyer.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central excise duty paid by ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim for Excise Duty Paid Under Protest by Manufacturer — Limitation Period Under Section 11B(1) Applies Separately to Buyer. The right of the buyer to claim refund under Section 11B(2)(e) is distinct from the manufacturer's right, and the benefit of the second proviso (waiver of limitation for duty paid under protest) does not extend to the buyer.

20 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of appeals filed by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central exci...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim in Central Excise Duty Case — Limitation Period Applies Separately to Buyer. The Court held that the period of limitation of six months under Section 11B(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 applies to a buyer's refund claim even if the manufacturer paid duty under protest, as the rights of manufacturer and buyer are distinct.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the appellant/buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central excise dut...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim for Excise Duty Paid Under Protest by Manufacturer — Limitation Period Under Section 11B Applies Separately to Buyer. The Court held that the buyer's refund claim is time-barred as it was filed beyond six months from the date of purchase, and the manufacturer's protest does not extend the limitation for the buyer.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central excise duty paid by ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim for Central Excise Duty Paid Under Protest by Manufacturer — Limitation Period Under Section 11B Applies Separately to Buyer. The right of the buyer to claim refund under Section 11B(2)(e) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is distinct from that of the manufacturer, and the benefit of the second proviso (duty paid under protest) does not extend to the buyer.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central excise duty paid by ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Finds Reliance Companies Guilty of Contempt for Breach of Undertakings to Pay INR 550 Crore to Ericsson India Pvt. Ltd. The court held that the undertakings making payment conditional upon sale of assets were contrary to the court's order and constituted wilful disobedience.

20 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court of India dealt with three contempt petitions filed by Ericsson India Pvt. Ltd. against Reliance Communications Ltd., Reliance Teleco...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Disposes of Writ Petition Seeking Re-investigation of Triple Murder Case, Directs CBI to Examine SIT Report. Court finds SIT report consistent with original charge sheet but notes lack of professional rigour in initial investigation.

20 Feb 2019

The case arises from the murder of Smt. Seema Garg, daughter-in-law of petitioner No.1, and her two children on 24.07.2001. FIR No.221 of 2001 was lod...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Reinstatement of Contract Workers in BHEL Case — Contract Labour Arrangement Held Sham Due to Direct Control and Supervision by Principal Employer. The Court affirmed that workmen performing identical duties under BHEL's supervision were entitled to reinstatement without backwages under the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves appeals by Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. (BHEL) against a judgment of the Uttarakhand High Court dismissing its writ petition challe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Modifies Interest Rate to 9% in Consumer Disputes Against Developer for Delayed Possession. The Court upheld deficiency in service but reduced interest from 15% to 9% per annum, following earlier precedent in Himanshu Arora case.

20 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals arising from consumer complaints against DLF Homes Panchkula (P) Ltd. regarding its residential proje...

210 211 212 213 214

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)