Search Results for "Unfair trade practice"

17 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 17 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Developer's Appeals in Consumer Disputes Over Delayed Flat Possession -- NCDRC Orders Upheld for Completion, Compensation, and Costs Under Consumer Protection Act

The Supreme Court addressed three civil appeals arising from NCDRC orders in consumer complaints filed by flat buyers against Parsvnath Developers Ltd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Dispute, Holds Flat Purchasers as Consumers Under Consumer Protection Act Despite Subsequent Leasing. NCDRC Decision Reversed and Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Appellants and Another against Respondents and Another -- The Court reversed the NCDRC's decision which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside NCDRC Order : No Privity of Contract Between Parties, Respondent Not a ‘Consumer’ Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Court Holds No Tripartite Agreement Proven, Respondent Not Entitled to Compensation Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986

Privity of Contract Essential for Consumer Status: The Court reiterated that for a person to qualify as a ‘consumer’ under the CPA, t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarified the Scope of Interim Moratorium under Section 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – Held That Regulatory Penalties Imposed by the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Are Not Covered

Invoking Insolvency Proceedings Cannot stay execution of Penalty Orders for Consumer Protection Law Violations – The Apex Court Upheld the NCDRC’s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India Ruled on the Definition of ‘Consumer’ Under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 in Loan Transactions

The Apex Court Held That a Borrower of a Project Loan Does Not Qualify as a ‘Consumer’ When the Loan is Availed for Commercial Purposes The Supre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Earnest Money Forfeiture – Contractual Obligations – One-Sided Agreements – Consumer Protection

Forfeiture Clause – Valid But Limited to 10% of BSP – Contractual forfeiture of 20% BSP was excessive – Courts can interfere with unfair and one...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Consumer Complaint Against Builder for Delayed Possession and Failure to Obtain Occupation Certificate -- Opp. Parties Project Found Deficient in Service Under Consumer Protection Act

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission disposed of two consumer complaints filed by complainants against Opp. Parties. The Complainants h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Orders Refund to Homebuyer in Vatika India Next Project - Consumer Protection Act Applies to Plot Allotment Despite Arbitration Clause - Deficiency in Service Established for Delayed Possession

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission allowed a consumer complaint filed by Complainant( s) against Opp.Party(s) for deficiency in servi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

“Fair Hearing, Delayed Resolution: Judicial Discretion in SEBI’s Show-Cause Notice” Balancing justice and due process amidst allegations of delay, laches, and procedural fairness.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a petition challenging a show-cause notice issued by SEBI, emphasizing the need for judicial restraint in interfering...